From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Securities Exchange Commission v. Steinberg

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 26, 2007
99-CV-6050 (ARR) (JMA) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2007)

Opinion

99-CV-6050 (ARR) (JMA).

March 26, 2007


OPINION AND ORDER


The court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated March 1, 2007, from the Honorable Joan M. Azrack, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. Having conducted a review of the record, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, the court grants plaintiff summary judgment as to defendants Gershon Tannenbaum and Jay Vermonty. The court denies plaintiff summary judgment as to defendant Carmen Vermonty. In addition, the court dismisses without prejudice the case against Noah Steinberg.

The court further refers the case to Magistrate Judge Azrack to conduct a damages inquest and issue a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. Securities Exchange Commission v. Steinberg

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 26, 2007
99-CV-6050 (ARR) (JMA) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. Securities Exchange Commission v. Steinberg

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. NOAH…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Mar 26, 2007

Citations

99-CV-6050 (ARR) (JMA) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2007)

Citing Cases

All. Shippers, Inc. v. Choez (In re Choez)

This includes "the burden of demonstrating that the opposing party had a full and fair opportunity to…