From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Aug 29, 2016
No. 2:15-cr-187-GZS (D. Me. Aug. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cr-187-GZS

08-29-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERIC, v. JOSEPH EUGENE CLARK


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 19, 2016, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 51). Defendant filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 57) on August 12, 2016. The United States filed a Response to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 58) on August 17, 2016.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (ECF No. 23) is hereby GRANTED with respect to the statement: "You got good information, don't you?" and otherwise DENIED.

/s/ George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge Dated this 29th day of August, 2016.


Summaries of

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Aug 29, 2016
No. 2:15-cr-187-GZS (D. Me. Aug. 29, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERIC, v. JOSEPH EUGENE CLARK

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Aug 29, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-cr-187-GZS (D. Me. Aug. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

United States v. Clark

Below, McGoon testified that Clark was "speaking softly and looking straight ahead rather than turning to…