From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ursery v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Oct 17, 2006
203 S.W.3d 767 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 86710.

October 17, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Angela Turner Quigless, Judge.

Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jayne T. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.



ORDER


Stanley Ursery ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. In his appeal, Movant contends that the trial court erred when it failed to find Movant's trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no error and affirm.

Mo. Rules Crim. Proc. 2004.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ursery v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Oct 17, 2006
203 S.W.3d 767 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Ursery v. State

Case Details

Full title:Stanley URSERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Oct 17, 2006

Citations

203 S.W.3d 767 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Ursery v. Steele

Ursery appealed to the Missouri Court of Appeals, but on October 17, 2006, the appellate court affirmed.…