From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urrea v. Sedgwick Avenue Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1993
191 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 18, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.).


The failure to secure the ladder on which plaintiff was standing against slippage by any means whatsoever constitutes a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) as a matter of law, for which defendants are absolutely liable (Fernandez v. MHP Land Assocs., 188 A.D.2d 417). The failure of any party to adduce a statement from plaintiff's co-workers is no reason for denying plaintiff summary judgment, absent a showing, other than mere speculation, that a bona fide issue exists as to plaintiff's credibility.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ross, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Urrea v. Sedgwick Avenue Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1993
191 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Urrea v. Sedgwick Avenue Associates

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN URREA, Appellant, v. SEDGWICK AVENUE ASSOCIATES et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 46

Citing Cases

Weeden v. First National Bank of Long Island

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by…

Wasilewski v. Museum of Modern Art

In any event, the factual question of whether the ladder fell is immaterial to the issue of whether defendant…