From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uptegrove v. Central R.R. Co.

City Court of New York — General Term
Nov 1, 1895
14 Misc. 460 (N.Y. City Ct. 1895)

Opinion

November, 1895.

De Forest Brothers, for appellant.

M.P. O'Connor, for respondent.


Both sides having moved for a direction of a verdict, left the question of law and fact to the trial justice to determine.

We have examined the facts very carefully and under Park v. Preston, 108 N.Y. 434, 437, think the judgment should be affirmed, and, so ordered, with costs. See Jennings v. Grand Trunk Railway of Canada, 127 N.Y. 449.

FITZSIMONS, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Uptegrove v. Central R.R. Co.

City Court of New York — General Term
Nov 1, 1895
14 Misc. 460 (N.Y. City Ct. 1895)
Case details for

Uptegrove v. Central R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM E. UPTEGROVE et al., Respondents, v . THE CENTRAL RAILROAD Co. of…

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Nov 1, 1895

Citations

14 Misc. 460 (N.Y. City Ct. 1895)
35 N.Y.S. 1118