From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uptain v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 24, 1924
101 So. 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)

Opinion

6 Div. 410.

June 3, 1924. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1924.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; R.L. Blanton, Judge.

Estel Uptain was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and appeals. Affirmed.

L.D. Gray, of Jasper, for appellant.

Motion for new trial should have been granted. Myers v. State, 19 Ala. App. 98, 95 So. 331.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No brief reached the Reporter.


There are no sufficient exceptions to the rulings of the trial court to present any question to this court for consideration and review save the ruling of the court in denying the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The evidence offered on this motion, while material, was merely cumulative, and as such would not justify the trial court in setting aside the verdict of the jury nor authorize this court in reversing the case. Grissett v. State, 18 Ala. App. 675, 94 So. 271.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Uptain v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 24, 1924
101 So. 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)
Case details for

Uptain v. State

Case Details

Full title:UPTAIN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 24, 1924

Citations

101 So. 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)
101 So. 75

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

As stated, hereinabove, these matters were supported by several affidavits, all of which have been carefully…