From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unocal Corp. v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1988
198 Cal.App.3d 1245 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)

Summary

In Unocal Corporation v. Superior Court and Harbor Insurance Corporation, 198 Cal.App.3d 1245, 244 Cal.Rptr. 540 (2nd Dist. 1988), the court noted that the right of insurance companies to cancel policies is not absolute and that cancellation provisions in an insurance policy are subject to the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Summary of this case from Hopkins v. Highlands Ins. Co.

Opinion

1988.


[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 1246 — 1337 CONTAINING UNOCAL CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT, PEOPLE v. RICKS AND PEOPLE v. MIDDLETON HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]

Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by orders dated June 2, 1988, June 9, 1988, and May 26, 1988.


Summaries of

Unocal Corp. v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1988
198 Cal.App.3d 1245 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)

In Unocal Corporation v. Superior Court and Harbor Insurance Corporation, 198 Cal.App.3d 1245, 244 Cal.Rptr. 540 (2nd Dist. 1988), the court noted that the right of insurance companies to cancel policies is not absolute and that cancellation provisions in an insurance policy are subject to the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Summary of this case from Hopkins v. Highlands Ins. Co.
Case details for

Unocal Corp. v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:Unocal Corp. v. Superior Court, People v. Ricks and People v. Middleton

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1988

Citations

198 Cal.App.3d 1245 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

State v. Young

The federal district court in Grigsby v. Mabry reviewed several ADP studies, concluding that even after…

McMartin v. Children's Institute International

Because there is no other activity alleged which constitutes racketeering activity under section 1961,…