From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unloading Corporation v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1987
132 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

July 6, 1987

Appeal from the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that "[a] promisee may not recover for a broken promise unless he has performed his obligations, usually categorized as a condition precedent", under the contract (McGrath v. Hilding, 41 N.Y.2d 625, 629; see, 5 Williston, Contracts § 676 [3d ed]). Here, the claimant failed to establish that it had performed its obligations under the contract; thus, the court properly granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the claim. Brown, J.P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Unloading Corporation v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1987
132 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Unloading Corporation v. State

Case Details

Full title:UNLOADING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1987

Citations

132 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Oliver Wyman, Inc. v. Eielson

But as the Court previously stated in its September 22, 2016 opinion: [W]hile it is true that a party…

Oliver Wyman, Inc. v. Eielson

Nevertheless, while it is true that a party generally may not recover under a contract if it has failed to…