From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unitherm Food Systems, v. Swift Eckrich

U.S.
Feb 28, 2005
543 U.S. 1186 (2005)

Summary

granting certiorari to resolve the scope of an appellate court's review in such situations

Summary of this case from Smith v. District of Columbia

Opinion

No. 04-597.

February 28, 2005.


Certiorari Granted.

C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Whether, and to what extent, a court of appeals may review the sufficiency of evidence supporting a civil jury verdict where the party requesting review made a motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure before submission of the case to the jury, but neither renewed that motion under Rule 50(b) after the jury's verdict, nor moved for a new trial under Rule 59?" Reported below: 375 F. 3d 1341.


Summaries of

Unitherm Food Systems, v. Swift Eckrich

U.S.
Feb 28, 2005
543 U.S. 1186 (2005)

granting certiorari to resolve the scope of an appellate court's review in such situations

Summary of this case from Smith v. District of Columbia
Case details for

Unitherm Food Systems, v. Swift Eckrich

Case Details

Full title:UNITHERM FOOD SYSTEMS, INC. v. SWIFT ECKRICH, INC., DBA CONAGRA…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 28, 2005

Citations

543 U.S. 1186 (2005)
125 S. Ct. 1396

Citing Cases

Smith v. District of Columbia

Moreover, because the District raised its sufficiency-of-the-evidence arguments as to the due process claim…

Fuesting v. Zimmer, Inc.

We stayed consideration of the petition because the Supreme Court had granted a writ of certiorari on the…