holding that the court may not impose the extra-statutory barrier of a "quasi-exhaustion" requirement in the foreign tribunal
Summary of this case from Eco Swiss China Time Ltd. v. Timex Corp.No. 92-18.
October 5, 1992.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 964 F. 2d 97.
holding that the court may not impose the extra-statutory barrier of a "quasi-exhaustion" requirement in the foreign tribunal
Summary of this case from Eco Swiss China Time Ltd. v. Timex Corp.Full title:UNITED TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., P W COMMERCIAL ENGINE BUSINESS v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 5, 1992
The Second Circuit has recognized section 1782's "twin aims of providing efficient means of assistance to…
Wightman v. Berkley Administrators of TexasPlaintiff argues that the Plan is a MEWA because it has been adopted by numerous companies affiliated with…