From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Zepeda

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 10, 2014
742 F.3d 910 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 10–10131.

2014-02-10

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Damien ZEPEDA, Defendant–Appellant.

Joan G. Ruffennach, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Michele R. Moretti, Esquire, Law Office of Michele R. Moretti, Lake Butler, FL, for Defendant–Appellant.


Joan G. Ruffennach, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Michele R. Moretti, Esquire, Law Office of Michele R. Moretti, Lake Butler, FL, for Defendant–Appellant.

ORDER


KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

United States v. Zepeda

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 10, 2014
742 F.3d 910 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Zepeda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAMIEN ZEPEDA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 10, 2014

Citations

742 F.3d 910 (9th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Stern

On February 10, 2014,the panel opinion in Zepeda was withdrawn pending rehearing en banc. United States v.…

United States v. Zepeda

We granted rehearing en banc. United States v. Zepeda, 742 F.3d 910 (9th Cir.2014). II.…