Summary
affirming for the reasons stated by the district court
Summary of this case from United States v. YoungOpinion
No. 13-6352
05-31-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MALCOLM CARL YOUNG, Defendant - Appellant.
Malcolm Carl Young, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Lee Souders, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cr-00036-GEC-JGW-1) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm Carl Young, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Lee Souders, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Carl Young appeals the district court's order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 5:09-cr-00036-GEC-JGW-1 (W.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED