From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Yorfino

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 23, 1969
412 F.2d 329 (5th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 27258.

July 2, 1969. Rehearing Denied July 23, 1969.

Walter E. Goetz, San Antonio, Tex., for appellants.

James F. Gardner, San Antonio, Tex., W.F. Nowlin, San Antonio, Tex., for appellees.

Before BELL and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, and ATKINS, District Judge.


We have carefully considered the errors assigned by plaintiffs. We find each to be without merit. No attorneys' fees were due. Transamerica Insurance Company v. Red Top Metal, Inc., 5 Cir., 1967, 384 F.2d 752. Moreover, this was not an issue in the district court.

In the absence of a cross-appeal, as was the case, defendants-appellees are without standing to contest the judgment entered by the district court herein. Mr. Goetz shall have ten days from the date the mandate issues to comply with the remittitur provision of the order of October 22, 1968, failing which defendants-appellees will be granted a new trial on the issue of the reasonable value of services rendered by Mr. Goetz. It may be added that defendants-appellees, notwithstanding the sparsity of evidence on the value of such services, do not, as stated, have standing to complain on this appeal.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Yorfino

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 23, 1969
412 F.2d 329 (5th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

United States v. Yorfino

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of GOETZ CONSTRUCTION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jul 23, 1969

Citations

412 F.2d 329 (5th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Marts v. Hines

ot before us"); Likens v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co., 69 F.2d 98, 99 (5th Cir. 1934) (question of…

Fain v. Caddo Parish Police Jury

Because the appellee did not appeal from the judgment below and improperly raised the issue for the first…