From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wyatt

United States District Court, Southern District of Illinois
Sep 8, 2021
98-cr-40002-JPG-003 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 8, 2021)

Opinion

98-cr-40002-JPG-003

09-08-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AARON WYATT, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on defendant Aaron Wyatt's motion to reduce his sentence to give him sentence credit for a prior state sentence that he believes should have run concurrently with his federal sentence (Doc. 451).

The Court has no jurisdiction now to reduce Wyatt's sentence in his criminal proceeding to give him sentence credit for serving another sentence. Once the Court sentences a defendant, it can only revisit that sentence in limited circumstances, none of which apply here. United States v. Wiggins, 798 Fed.Appx. 949, 950 (7th Cir. 2020) (citing United States v. Johnson, 571 F.3d 716, 717 (7th Cir. 2009)). Wyatt is challenging the Bureau of Prisons' (“BOP”) computation of his sentence, but that is a matter committed in the first instance to the Attorney General, through the BOP, not the sentencing court. United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 334 (1992); United States v. Walker, 917 F.3d 989, 993-94 (7th Cir. 2019). If a prisoner disagrees with the BOP's computation of his sentence, including sentence credit or whether it should run concurrently with another sentence, he may seek administrative review and then file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the district of his confinement. Walker, 917 F.3d at 994 (citing Jake v. Herschberger, 173 F.3d 1059, 1063 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Koller, 956 F.2d 1408, 1417 (7th Cir. 1992)). This Court does not have jurisdiction to grant the relief Wyatt seeks. See Walker, 917 F.3d at 993-94 (citing United States v. McGee, 60 F.3d 1266, 1272 (7th Cir. 1995)); United States v. Ross, 219 F.3d 592, 594 (7th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Wyatt's motion (Doc. 451) and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send him a form for filing a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which should assist him in filing a petition in the jurisdiction of his incarceration after he exhausts his administrative remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Wyatt

United States District Court, Southern District of Illinois
Sep 8, 2021
98-cr-40002-JPG-003 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 8, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Wyatt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AARON WYATT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Illinois

Date published: Sep 8, 2021

Citations

98-cr-40002-JPG-003 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 8, 2021)