From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Woodall

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 11, 1935
75 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1935)

Opinion

No. 7494.

March 11, 1935.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge.

Peirson M. Hall, U.S. Atty., and Hugh L. Dickson, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., and Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, and Keith L. Seegmiller and Lawrence A. Lawlor, Attys., Department of Justice, all of Washington, D.C., for the United States.

Volney P. Mooney, Jr., and Sylvester Hoffmann, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.


The record in this case is insufficient to raise the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank, 69 F.2d 312, 317. This is the only matter presented by appellant.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Woodall

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 11, 1935
75 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1935)
Case details for

United States v. Woodall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Walter WOODALL, Appellee

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 1935

Citations

75 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1935)