Opinion
23-6960
02-27-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson, Defendant-Appellant.
Andrew Scott Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 22, 2024
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-cr-00203-BO-1)
Andrew Scott Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Andrew Scott Wilson appeals the district court's order ruling on several motions, including denying Wilson's motions for compassionate release, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and for other miscellaneous relief. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wilson's motions. See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Wilson, No. 5:21-cr-00203-BO-1 (E.D. N.C. Sept. 6, 2023). We deny Wilson's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED