From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 6, 1991
943 F.2d 896 (8th Cir. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-1219EM.

Submitted August 26, 1991.

Decided September 6, 1991.

Lee Lawless, St. Louis, Mo., argued (Ilene Goodman, on brief), for appellant.

Raymond Gruender, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.


Darrell Everett Williams appeals the twelve month sentence he received following the revocation of his probation. We remand for resentencing.

Williams pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana, and on August 5, 1988, he was sentenced to three years probation. Williams later violated a number of state laws, including the sale of marijuana. In January 1991 the district court revoked Williams's probation and sentenced him to twelve months imprisonment. The district court sentenced Williams under the guidelines then in effect, applying policy statements contained in chapter seven of the sentencing guidelines that govern sentencing following probation revocation. See U.S.S.G. §§ 7B1.1, 7B1.3, 7B1.4 (Nov. 1, 1990).

Williams contends the district court committed error in failing to sentence him under the statutes and guidelines that applied when he was originally sentenced in August 1988. We agree. In United States v. Von Washington, 915 F.2d 390 (8th Cir. 1990), this court held that "following probation revocation, the district court [must] impose a sentence that was available at the time of the original sentencing." Id. at 391. Chapter seven of the guidelines did not become effective until November 1, 1990. Thus, the district court erroneously considered guideline policy statements that were not available when Williams was originally sentenced in August 1988.

Accordingly, we remand to the district court for resentencing. We leave to the district court the Government's contention that because Williams was in possession of a controlled substance, the district court must "sentence [Williams] to not less than one-third of the original sentence," 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a) (1988), notwithstanding the guidelines sentence required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b).


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 6, 1991
943 F.2d 896 (8th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. DARRELL EVERETT WILLIAMS, APPELLANT

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 1991

Citations

943 F.2d 896 (8th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Levi

Also, we note that in the probation revocation context, 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a)(2) clearly requires the court to…

U.S. v. Gaskins

Thus, the Guidelines themselves, and more specifically the policy statements set forth in Chapter VII, were…