From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Whitsell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 16, 2014
Case No. 09-cr-20236 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 09-cr-20236 Related Case No. 13-10452

09-16-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. QUENTON THOMAS WHITSELL, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT'S SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 LETTER/ MOTION REQUESTING TRANSCRIPTS [#110]

On September 10, 2014, the Clerk of the Court docketed a letter/motion filed by Defendant Quenton Thomas Whitsell. The court will deny the motion without prejudice because, at the time of the filing, Defendant was represented by counsel. Thus, all filings must be made by the attorney of record.

Defendant is not entitled to represent himself while simultaneously represented by counsel. There is no right to "hybrid" representation that would result in simultaneous or alternating self-representation and representation by counsel. A person represented by counsel must rely upon that counsel. See, e.g., United States v. Olson, 576 F.2d 1267, 1269-70 (8th Cir. 1978); Daniels, 572 F.2d at 540; Ennis, 560 F.2d at 1075; Williams, 534 F.2d at 123; United States v. Hill, 526 F.2d 1019, 1024-25 (10th Cir. 1975); Move Org. v. City of Phila., 89 F.R.D. 521, 523 n.1 (E.D.Pa.1981); United States ex rel. Snyder v. Mack, 372 F.Supp. 1077, 1078-79 (E.D.Pa.1974); cf. Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349, 1352-53 (9th Cir. 1981) (once counsel is appointed, prisoner has no right to assistance from inmate writer).

For the foregoing reasons, the Court will only accept motions filed by Defendant's attorneys of record.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Whitsell's Motion/Letter Request for Transcripts [#110] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

/s/ Gershwin A. Drain

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: September 16, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, September 16, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

/s/ Tanya Bankston

Case Manager

(313) 234-5215


Summaries of

United States v. Whitsell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 16, 2014
Case No. 09-cr-20236 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Whitsell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. QUENTON THOMAS WHITSELL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 16, 2014

Citations

Case No. 09-cr-20236 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2014)