From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wanger

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1970
426 F.2d 1360 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 24673.

May 8, 1970.

Wesley C. Blake (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Brian E. Michaels (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., Warren P. Reese, Chief Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

Honorable William M. Byrne, Senior United States District Judge, Los Angeles, California, sitting by designation.


The judgment of conviction is vacated, and the cause is remanded for a new trial. Wade v. United States, 426 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. Mar. 30, 1970).

The appellant did not forfeit his rights under Wade by failing to object to jury instructions which applied the law as it was firmly established prior to Wade, nor should he be penalized for his attorney's not having requested jury instructions which, at the time of his trial, would have been inconsistent with the law as it then existed. Compare United States v. Scott, 425 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. Mar. 6, 1970).


Summaries of

United States v. Wanger

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1970
426 F.2d 1360 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

United States v. Wanger

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William Walter WANGER, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 8, 1970

Citations

426 F.2d 1360 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

United States v. Powers

The Government concedes that the case now before us falls within the limited retroactivity of the Wade…

United States v. Porter

Ordinarily this would mean that defendant would be entitled to reversal only if plain error could be shown.…