From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Van Alstyne

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 3, 2003
77 F. App'x 937 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


77 Fed.Appx. 937 (9th Cir. 2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Lance VAN ALSTYNE, Defendant--Appellant. No. 02-50027. D.C. No. CR-98-00118-AHS-01. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 3, 2003

Argued and Submitted September 11, 2003.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BEEZER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and ENGLAND, District Judge.

ORDER

We remand this case to the district court for the sole purpose of correcting the court's judgment to reflect a maximum sentence of 290 months. We do so pursuant to the parties' oral stipulation in open court that the oral pronouncement takes precedence over the written judgment.

The district court is instructed to issue the corrected final judgment within 30 days of this Order, upon appropriate prior notice to the parties. Upon issuing the corrected final judgment, the district court shall notify this Court and the parties in writing of the judgment and provide copies thereof. Within 10 days of this notification, counsel for the parties may submit to this Court any further objections to the form of the corrected judgment. After those 10 days elapse, this Court will take the matter under submission to issue an appropriate order or opinion.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on the district court.

Limited Remand.


Summaries of

United States v. Van Alstyne

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 3, 2003
77 F. App'x 937 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

United States v. Van Alstyne

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Lance VAN ALSTYNE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 3, 2003

Citations

77 F. App'x 937 (9th Cir. 2003)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Van Alstyne

This court issued a limited remand to the district court for the sole purpose of amending the judgment to…