From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tyson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Feb 21, 2019
Crim. No. 18-612 (KM) (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2019)

Opinion

Crim. No. 18-612 (KM)

02-21-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHYHEIM TYSON


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

On January 7, 2017, I sentenced the defendant, Shyheim Tyson, to 37 months' imprisonment on firearms charges. At the time, two state charges were pending, but sentence had not yet been imposed. Now before the Court is the defendant's letter application (DE 44) to amend the judgment to provide that the federal sentence shall run concurrently with the subsequentiy-imposed sentences on those state charges. The government has filed a letter response (DE 45) opposing the application on jurisdictional grounds.

A federal "court cannot modify a term of imprisonment after it has been imposed without specific authorization." McMillan v. United States, 257 F. App'x 477, 479 (3d Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (citation omitted); see also Dillion v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 819 (2010). I agree with the government that I now lack jurisdiction to alter the judgment. (See DE 45 (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3582; United States v. Sharpe, 554 F. App'x 123 (3d Cir. 2014); United States v. Mendez, Crim. No. 13-235 WJM, 2018 WL 1919952 (D.N.J. April 24, 2018); United States v. Thompson, Crim. No. 12-194, 2017 WL 4418457 (M.D. Pa. October 5, 2017)). I add that this is not a motion brought timely within 14 days under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). Nor is it a motion to correct clerical error which may be filed at any time under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36; the written judgment accurately reflects the sentence as it was imposed orally.

At this point, the matter is in the hands of the Bureau of Prisons, which will compute the running of the defendant's sentence. Any objection to that calculation should be pursued, at least initially, by exhausting all administrative remedies before the BOP. See Mendez, supra (citing United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 334-35 (1992); Moscato v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 98 F.3d 757, 760 (3d Cir. 1996)).

IT IS THEREFORE this 21st day of February, 2019

ORDERED that the defendant's letter application (DE 44) to amend the judgment is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.

/s/ _________

KEVIN MCNULTY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Tyson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Feb 21, 2019
Crim. No. 18-612 (KM) (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Tyson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHYHEIM TYSON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Feb 21, 2019

Citations

Crim. No. 18-612 (KM) (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2019)