From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Aug 22, 2014
CASE NO. 13-14055-CR-MARTINEZ (S.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 13-14055-CR-MARTINEZ

08-22-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. JESUS TORRES, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Order of Reference from the District Court on Defendant's pro se letter to the Court (D. E. No. 234).

THE MATTER was referred to Magistrate Judge Frank J. Lynch Jr, on August 15, 2014. A Report and Recommendation was filed on August 19, 2014, (D. E. No. 238), recommending that the Defendant's pro se Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea denied for the reasons stated in the report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and record and notes that no objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court affirms and adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation (D.E. No 238) of United States Magistrate Judge Frank J. Lynch Jr, is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. The Defendant's pro se Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea (D. E. No. 234) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 22 day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copied: Hon. Magistrate Lynch
All Counsel Of Record
Jesus Torres 221816
900 N. Rock RD
St. Lucie County Jail
Ft. Pierce, FL 34945


Summaries of

United States v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Aug 22, 2014
CASE NO. 13-14055-CR-MARTINEZ (S.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. JESUS TORRES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 22, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 13-14055-CR-MARTINEZ (S.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lorquet

“There is no evidence of such prejudice before this Court aside from the fact that witnesses would have to be…