From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tiplitz

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 9, 1953
202 F.2d 60 (3d Cir. 1953)

Opinion

No. 10862.

Argued February 2, 1953.

Decided February 9, 1953.

Meyer Rothwacks, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., (Grover C. Richman, Jr., U.S. Atty. and Charles J. Tyne, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.

George R. Sommer, Newark, N.J. (David Tiplitz, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellant.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.


The United States has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case on the ground that the order appealed from D.C., 105 F. Supp. 512, is not an appealable order within the purview of Sections 1291 and 1292, Title 28, U.S.C. The order was one denying a motion to dismiss the indictment. See Atlantic Fishermen's Union, etc., v. United States, 1 Cir., 195 F.2d 1021 and Atlantic Fishermen's Union, etc., v. United States, 1 Cir., 197 F.2d 519. Since the order clearly is not an appealable one the motion to dismiss will be granted and the appeal will be dismissed.


Summaries of

United States v. Tiplitz

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 9, 1953
202 F.2d 60 (3d Cir. 1953)
Case details for

United States v. Tiplitz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. TIPLITZ

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 1953

Citations

202 F.2d 60 (3d Cir. 1953)

Citing Cases

United States v. Golden

As was said in Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 236, 65 S.Ct. 631, 635: "But denial of a motion to…

State v. Strickland

Moreover, it has been held that any conflict between a general and a specific statute covering a subject in a…