From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Taylor

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 14, 1964
336 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 20516.

September 14, 1964.

Robert E. Hauberg, U.S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., Alan S. Rosenthal, Washington, D.C., E.R. Holmes, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., Stephen B. Swartz, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Vardaman S. Dunn, Jackson, Miss., Bruce C. Aultman, Hattiesburg, Miss., William H. Cox, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HOOPER, District Judge.


On motion for rehearing it has for the first time here been urged that this matter be remanded for trial of the issues of the finality and conclusiveness of the disputes award and as to the corporate defendant the issues under their alleged defense of the Mississippi Statute of Frauds, Mississippi Code 1952, Section 264. There were pleadings to support such issues in the court below though the summary judgment was not based upon them. We are of the opinion that a remand on these issues alone is proper and that on remand such additional evidence as is necessary may be introduced.

41 U.S.C.A. § 321.

The judgment below is REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.


Summaries of

United States v. Taylor

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 14, 1964
336 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

United States v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. R.H. TAYLOR et al., Appellees

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 1964

Citations

336 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

United States v. Taylor

Adhered to on Rehearing September 14, 1964. See 336 F.2d 149. Robert E. Hauberg, U.S. Atty., E.R. Holmes,…

Patton Wrecking Dem. Co. v. Tenn. Valley Auth.

The courts have generally held that a complaining party must follow the administrative procedure to adjust a…