From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tate

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 23, 1978
575 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

Nos. 77-5301, 77-5302.

Argued April 12, 1978.

Decided and Filed May 23, 1978.

Timothy J. Potts, Summers, Potts Burke, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellant in No. 77-5301.

Donald N. Krosin, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant in No. 77-5302.

William D. Beyer, U.S. Atty., Solomon Oliver, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

Before WEICK, EDWARDS and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from jury convictions for armed bank robbery and aiding and abetting armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)(d) and 2 (1976).

The proofs at trial showed that both defendants were arrested in an automobile rented by William Tate, in which automobile was found a shopping bag with some of the loot from the bank, including bait bills. The arrest had been made as a result of an eyewitness to the robbery who identified Sylvester Tate as the bank robber and also took down the license number of the rented car. These, plus other proofs, were more than sufficient to sustain the jury verdict of guilty as to both appellants, and we find no reversible error in the trial proceedings or the judge's charge.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Tate

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 23, 1978
575 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

United States v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. SYLVESTER TATE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: May 23, 1978

Citations

575 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Wallach

To achieve its purpose, the statute precludes federal employees from receiving any compensation from private…

U.S. v. Hintz

This evidence is consistent with that in other armed bank-robbery cases. See United States v. Tate, 575 F.2d…