From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sutton

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 7, 1979
642 F.2d 1001 (6th Cir. 1979)

Summary

In Sutton, however we considered the RICO charges for purposes of sentencing and vacated certain non-consecutive sentences due to the close identity of proofs.

Summary of this case from United States v. Qaoud

Opinion

Nos. 78-5134—78-5135—78-5136—78-5137—78-5138— 78-5139—78-5141—78-5142—78-5143 and 78-5074.

November 7, 1979.


ORDER

A majority of the judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court, 605 F.2d 260, is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and the cases will be scheduled during the February, 1980 session.


Summaries of

United States v. Sutton

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 7, 1979
642 F.2d 1001 (6th Cir. 1979)

In Sutton, however we considered the RICO charges for purposes of sentencing and vacated certain non-consecutive sentences due to the close identity of proofs.

Summary of this case from United States v. Qaoud
Case details for

United States v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CARL SUTTON, JR., ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Nov 7, 1979

Citations

642 F.2d 1001 (6th Cir. 1979)

Citing Cases

United States v. Qaoud

4) the conduct of those affairs involved two or more of the racketeering offenses set forth in the statute.…

U.S. v. Jennings

4. the conduct of those affairs involved two or more of the racketeering offenses set forth in the…