From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stanley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 16, 2012
688 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10–50206.

2012-08-16

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Kevin Lloyd STANLEY, aka Kevin Stanley, Defendant–Appellant.

Yvonne L. Garcia, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Mark Remy Yohalem, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Carlton Gunn, Esquire, Kaye McLane & Bednarski, LLP, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.


Yvonne L. Garcia, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Mark Remy Yohalem, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Carlton Gunn, Esquire, Kaye McLane & Bednarski, LLP, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.
D.C. No. 2:09–cr–00486–ODW–1, Central District of California, Los Angeles.
Before: STEPHEN S. TROTT, JAY S. BYBEE, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Opinion filed August 2, 2011, and appearing at 653 F.3d 946 (9th Cir.2011), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.

With the Opinion withdrawn, the Defendant–Appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is moot. The parties may file a petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc regarding the Memorandum Disposition filed August 16, 2012.


Summaries of

United States v. Stanley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 16, 2012
688 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEVIN LLOYD STANLEY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Citations

688 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2012)