From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Spaulding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 10, 2016
5:15-CV-0482 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2016)

Opinion

5:15-CV-0482 (LEK/DEP)

02-10-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN A. SPAULDING, Defendant.


DECISION and ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

On April 21, 2015, Plaintiff United States of America ("Plaintiff") commenced this action alleging that Defendant John Spaulding ("Defendant") defaulted on two promissory notes. Dkt. No. 1 ("Complaint"). Plaintiff previously requested a default judgment, which the Court denied due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with Local Rule 55.2. See Dkt. Nos. 8; 9. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b). Dkt. No. 10 ("Motion"). For the following reasons, the Motion is granted.

II. BACKGROUND

On October 16, 1984, Defendant executed a promissory note to secure a loan in the amount of $2,500.00 from Key Bank of Central New York, located in Syracuse, New York. Dkt. No. 1-1 ("Exhibits") at 1. On July 16, 1985, Defendant executed a second promissory note for a loan in the amount of $2,500.00 with the New York State Higher Education Department. Id. at 2. The loans were guaranteed by the New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, and then reinsured by the United States Department of Education under authorized loan guaranty programs. Dkt. No. 1-2 ("Certificate of Indebtedness"). Defendant defaulted on the loans, and Plaintiff commenced the present action. Compl. Defendant did not file a responsive pleading, and on May 29, 2015, the Clerk filed an Entry of default against Defendant at Plaintiff's request. Dkt. Nos. 6, 7. On June 3, 2015, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for default judgment, seeking an award of $5,595.28 in unpaid principal and $6,349.39 in accrued interest as of April 15, 2015. Dkt. No. 10-2 at 2.

Citations to the Exhibits correspond with the pagination assigned by the Court's Electronic Filing System.

III. LEGAL STANDARD

"Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 provides a two-step process that the Court must follow before it may enter a default judgment against a defendant." Elec. Creations Corp. v. Gigahertz, Inc., No. 12-CV-1423, 2013 WL 3229125, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. June 25, 2013) (quoting Robertson v. Doe, No. 05-CV-7046, 2008 WL 2519894, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 19, 2008)). "First, under Rule 55(a), when a party fails to plead or otherwise defend . . . the clerk must enter the party's default." Id. Second, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), "the party seeking default judgment is required to present its application for entry of judgment to the court." Id.

"When a default is entered, the defendant is deemed to have admitted all of the well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint pertaining to liability." Bravado Int'l Grp. Merch. Servs., Inc. v. Ninna, Inc., 655 F. Supp. 2d 177, 188 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (citing Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L. U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 1992)). "While a default judgment constitutes an admission of liability, the quantum of damages remains to be established by proof unless the amount is liquidated or susceptible of mathematical computation." Flaks v. Koegel, 504 F.2d 702, 707 (2d Cir. 1974); see also Bravado Int'l, 655 F. Supp. 2d at 189. "[E]ven upon default, a court may not rubber-stamp the non-defaulting party's damages calculation, but rather must ensure that there is a basis for the damages that are sought." Robertson, 2008 WL 2519894, at *3. "The burden is on the plaintiff to establish its entitlement to recovery." Bravado Int'l, 655 F. Supp. 2d at 189. "While 'the court must ensure that there is a basis for the damages specified in a default judgment, it may, but need not, make the determination through a hearing.'" Id. at 190..

Under Local Rule 55.2(b), the moving party must submit with its motion for default judgment: (1) a clerk's certificate of entry of default; (2) a proposed form of default judgment; (3) a copy of the pleading to which no response has been made; and (4) an affidavit. N.D.N.Y. L.R. 55.2(b). The affidavit must set forth that: (1) the party against whom judgment is sought is not an infant, incompetent, or in military service; (2) the party against whom judgment is sought has defaulted in appearance in the action; (3) service was properly effected under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4; (4) the amount sought is justly due and owing, and no part has been paid; and (5) the disbursements sought to be taxed have been made in the action or will necessarily be made or incurred. N.D.N.Y. L.R. 55.2(a).

IV. DISCUSSION

In the present case, Plaintiff has met its burden of showing that it is entitled to a default judgment. The Complaint and Exhibits attached thereto demonstrate that Defendant executed promissory notes to obtain two student loans. The Department of Education has demanded payment in accordance with the terms of the notes and to date, Defendant has failed to pay the debt. These allegations, which are deemed admitted by Defendant's failure to respond, are sufficient to establish Defendant's liability. See Cotton v. Slone, 4 F.3d 176, 181 (2d Cir. 1993).

V. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion (Dkt. No. 10) for default judgment is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as follows: $5,595.28 in unpaid principal and $6,719.62 in accrued interest, for a total award of $12,314.90; plus post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 10, 2016

Albany, New York

/s/_________

Lawrence E. Kahn

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Spaulding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 10, 2016
5:15-CV-0482 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Spaulding

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN A. SPAULDING, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 10, 2016

Citations

5:15-CV-0482 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2016)

Citing Cases

United States v. Gagnon

(Dkt. No. 1, at 1-2 [Compl.].) These allegations are sufficient to establish Defendant's liability.United…