From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rosenthal

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Sep 18, 1986
801 F.2d 378 (11th Cir. 1986)

Opinion

Nos. 84-8969, 85-8108 and 85-8217.

September 18, 1986.

Craig Gillen, Atlanta, Ga., Asst. U.S. Atty., for U.S.

R.C. Cougill, Lilburn, Ga., (Court Appointed), for Rosenthal.

Arthur W. Tifford, Miami, Fla., for Dunleavy.

Frank J. Petrella, Atlanta, Ga., for Lombardi Bonadonna.

William T. Payne, Atlanta, Ga. (Court Appointed), for Watson.

Gil Howard, Atlanta, Ga. (Court Appointed), for Joseph V. Junker

Bruce S. Harvey, Atlanta, Ga., for Stewart.

Howard J. Manchel, Atlanta, Ga. (Court Appointed), for Rose Marie Junker.

Paul Kehir, Snellville, Ga. (Court Appointed), for Wilson.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before GODBOLD and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS, Senior District Judge.

Honorable Daniel H. Thomas, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

Before GODBOLD, and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS, Senior District Judge.

Honorable Daniel H. Thomas, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.


MODIFIED OPINION

In our opinion United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214 (11th Cir. 1986), Appellant Harold Rosenthal's conviction on Count Thirteen, conspiracy to import cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963, was vacated due to said offense merging with his § 848 conviction and sentence.

In his motion for modification of opinion, Appellant Bonadonna argues that his conviction for the same offense should be vacated in light of Bonadonna's adoption of the arguments asserted by his co-appellants. An examination of the record discloses that Bonadonna, with respect to his § 963 conviction, is in the same posture as Rosenthal. Accordingly, Bonadonna's conviction and sentence under Count Thirteen must be, and hereby is, VACATED. United States v. Harrington, 761 F.2d 1482 (11th Cir. 1985).


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC


Petitions for rehearing filed by Joseph Vincent Junker, George Lombardi, and Harold Joseph Rosenthal are DENIED. The petition for rehearing filed by Philip Anthony Bonadonna, except to the extent previously granted is DENIED. No member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the suggestions for rehearing en banc filed by George Lombardi, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, Harold Joseph Rosenthal and Rose Marie Junker, are DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Rosenthal

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Sep 18, 1986
801 F.2d 378 (11th Cir. 1986)
Case details for

United States v. Rosenthal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HAROLD JOSEPH ROSENTHAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Sep 18, 1986

Citations

801 F.2d 378 (11th Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez

Since our decision in Stonehill, other circuit courts of appeals have addressed the "joint venture" doctrine,…

U.S. v. Reyes-Vasquez

Under Reyes' version of the facts, when the CIA agents staking out the house saw the DEA arrive, the CIA…