From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roberts

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 15, 1959
179 F. Supp. 478 (D.D.C. 1959)

Opinion

No. 769-59.

December 15, 1959.

Francis J. Wilson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for the United States.

Denis K. Lane, Washington, D.C., for defendant.


The Court is unable to determine whether the defendant, Jessie C. Brown, was prejudiced in the trial of his case by the familiarity of juror No. 8, Atha N. Henson, with one of the witnesses for the defense, Mrs. Vina Smith, defendant's mother. Because of the undisputed evidence adduced at the contempt hearing, as appears more particularly in the memorandum filed this day in United States v. Henson, D.C., 179 F. Supp. 474, that Mrs. Henson recognized Mrs. Smith when she took the witness stand and then failed to notify the Court, the Court finds it necessary, sua sponte, to grant a new trial.

Accordingly, it is by the Court this 15th day of December, 1959,

Ordered that the defendant be, and he hereby is granted a new trial.


Summaries of

United States v. Roberts

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 15, 1959
179 F. Supp. 478 (D.D.C. 1959)
Case details for

United States v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America v. Jesse C. BROWN

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Dec 15, 1959

Citations

179 F. Supp. 478 (D.D.C. 1959)

Citing Cases

United States v. Henson

On October 6 and 7, 1959, I presided over the jury trial of one Jesse C. Brown. Brown was indicted for…

State v. Tuttle

Upon the basis of evidence here we can see no reason for concluding that the trial court was in error in…