From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Reid

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 6, 1972
469 F.2d 1094 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-2487. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

December 6, 1972.

William S. Guy, McComb, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

Robert E. Hauberg, U.S. Atty., E. Donald Strange, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.



In this appeal from a jury trial conviction for carrying on the business of a distiller without having given bond, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5601(a)(4), appellant contends (1) that his motion for acquittal was erroneously denied, (2) that it was plain error for the trial judge to instruct the jury that witnesses are presumed to testify truthfully, and (3) that it was plain error to admit certain hearsay testimony. We conclude that the trial court committed no reversible error; but our holding is not to be construed as approving an instruction to the jury that witnesses are presumed to testify truthfully. See Knapp v. United States, 5th Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 794.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Reid

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 6, 1972
469 F.2d 1094 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Reid

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JERRY LUCIOUS REID…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 6, 1972

Citations

469 F.2d 1094 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

State v. Canaday

In many of the other cases cited by appellant, the court held that a similar instruction was not plain error.…

Cupp v. Naughten

The courts of appeals in every circuit have disapproved of presumption-of-truthfulness instructions and have…