From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rashid

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 25, 2021
No. 20-7038 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-7038

02-25-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAKIM ABDULAH RASHID, a/k/a Rodney Buchanan, Defendant - Appellant.

Hakim Abdulah Rashid, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1) Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hakim Abdulah Rashid, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hakim Abdulah Rashid appeals the district court's order denying, without prejudice, Rashid's motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Rashid, No. 4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1 (D.S.C. June 26, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Although the district court denied the motion without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir. 2020). --------

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Rashid

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 25, 2021
No. 20-7038 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Rashid

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAKIM ABDULAH RASHID…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 25, 2021

Citations

No. 20-7038 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2021)