From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Quigley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 17, 1972
462 F.2d 625 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-1465.

July 17, 1972.

George Tamblyn, of Tamblyn, Bouneff, McLennan, Muller, Marshall Hawkes, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant.

Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., Jack C. Wong, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before ELY, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.


Quigley was charged with and convicted of passing and selling counterfeit currency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472.

His attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge of "selling" is without merit. The government was not required to prove both passing and selling, even though the indictment so charged. Cf. Arellanes v. United States, 302 F.2d 603, 609 (CA9 1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 930, 83 S.Ct. 294, 9 L.Ed.2d 238 (1962); United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 525 (CA9 1972); McGriff v. United States, 408 F.2d 333, 334 (CA9 1969).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Quigley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 17, 1972
462 F.2d 625 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Quigley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DONALD WAYNE QUIGLEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 17, 1972

Citations

462 F.2d 625 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. DeFilippis

This is the standard form of an indictment, however, and the government only has to prove one or the other…

Head v. United States

The contention is without merit. Arellanes v. United States, 302 F.2d 603 (9th Cir., 1962), cert. denied 371…