From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perez

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Aug 24, 1992
975 F.2d 677 (10th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

No. 90-4149.

August 24, 1992.

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, MOORE, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY, EBEL, KELLY, Circuit Judges and SPARR, District Judge.

Honorable Daniel B. Sparr, District Judge, of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, sitting by designation.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the government's petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and the appellant's response:

The petition for rehearing is denied by the panel that rendered the decision sought to be reheard.

In accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 35(b), the clerk transmitted the suggestion for rehearing en banc to members of the panel and to all other judges of the court in regular active service. A vote was taken and pursuant thereto the court grants rehearing en banc of those issues raised in the government's petition.

Oral argument on rehearing en banc is set for Tuesday, September 29, at 2:30 p.m. in the United States Courthouse, Denver, Colorado.


Summaries of

United States v. Perez

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Aug 24, 1992
975 F.2d 677 (10th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

United States v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. OSCAR J. PEREZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Aug 24, 1992

Citations

975 F.2d 677 (10th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Perez

The government petitioned for rehearing en banc, urging us to reconsider Radeker. We granted the petition,…