From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.

U.S.
Dec 11, 1967
389 U.S. 308 (1967)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

No. 26.

Argued December 7, 1967. Decided December 11, 1967.

246 F. Supp. 917, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Edwin M. Zimmerman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Ralph S. Spritzer, Daniel M. Friedman and Richard A. Posner.

Albert R. Connelly and H. Francis DeLone argued the cause for appellees. With them on the brief were William S. Potter, John W. Barnum and Eugene P. Souther.


The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.

U.S.
Dec 11, 1967
389 U.S. 308 (1967)
Case details for

United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v . PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL CO. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 11, 1967

Citations

389 U.S. 308 (1967)

Citing Cases

Stanley Works v. F.T.C.

Toward that objective responsibility for cabinet hardware was transferred to the Manager responsible for…

United States v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.

( 376 U.S., at 175, 84 S.Ct. 1044). On the remand, the district court concluded that there was no reasonable…