From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pendleton

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 17, 2010
393 F. App'x 416 (8th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-3581.

Submitted: September 14, 2010.

Filed: September 17, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

David E. Woods, O'Fallon, MO, for appellant.

Sammy Pendleton, Springfield, MO, pro se.

Earl W. Brown III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Springfield, MO (Beth Phillips, U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellee.

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Sammy Pendleton appeals the order of the District Court committing him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4246, which provides for the hospitalization of a federal prisoner who is due for release but has been found — after a hearing and by clear and convincing evidence — to be suffering from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another. Upon careful review, we conclude that the District Court did not clearly err in its relevant findings given the expert opinions of mental health professionals and in light of evidence in the record that Pendleton has a long history of mental illness, dangerousness, and noncompliance with medications. See United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676-77 (8th Cir. 2002) (clear-error standard of review; upholding § 4246 commitment); United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970-71 (8th Cir.) (upholding § 4246 commitment; noting that factors in determining potential dangerousness include history of dangerousness, history of drug or alcohol use, identification of potential targets, previous use of weapons, recent incidents manifesting dangerousness, and history of problems taking prescribed medicines), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1064, 115 S.Ct. 679, 130 L.Ed.2d 611 (1994).

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

We also note that Pendleton's custodians have an ongoing obligation to prepare annual reports concerning his mental condition and the need for his continued hospitalization, 18 U.S.C. § 4247(e)(1)(B), and to make reasonable efforts to place him in a suitable state facility, 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d).

Accordingly, we affirm.


Summaries of

United States v. Pendleton

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 17, 2010
393 F. App'x 416 (8th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

United States v. Pendleton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Sammy PENDLETON, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 17, 2010

Citations

393 F. App'x 416 (8th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Pendleton v. Sanders

The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed Pendleton's commitment. See United States v. Pendleton,…