From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Patrick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jan 7, 2015
Case No. 13-CR-234 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 7, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 13-CR-234

01-07-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAMIAN PATRICK, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

Magistrate Judge William E. Callahan, Jr. has recommended to this Court that Defendant Damian Patrick's (Patrick) motion to suppress be denied.

Patrick has objected, the government has filed a response, and the Court has reviewed the decision and the responses. Because the Court thinks that Magistrate Judge Callahan has utilized precedent that is more cogent than that relied upon by Patrick, the Court will adopt Magistrate Judge Callahan's recommendation and deny the motion to suppress.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Patrick's motion to suppress (ECF No. 41) is DENIED.

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 7th day of January, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Patrick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jan 7, 2015
Case No. 13-CR-234 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 7, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Patrick

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAMIAN PATRICK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Jan 7, 2015

Citations

Case No. 13-CR-234 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 7, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Felton

In Hornick, the Seventh Circuit confirmed Judge Fairchild's view, expressed in his concurrence in Harrington,…