From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pate

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 11, 2023
56 F.4th 1336 (11th Cir. 2023)

Opinion

No. 20-10545

01-11-2023

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Jermaine PATE, Defendant-Appellant.

Nancy Greenwood, U.S. Attorney's Office, Augusta, GA, James C. Stuchell, U.S. Attorney's Office, Savannah, GA, U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia, U.S. Attorney's Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Justin Maines, The Nye Law Group, PC, Savannah, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Nancy Greenwood, U.S. Attorney's Office, Augusta, GA, James C. Stuchell, U.S. Attorney's Office, Savannah, GA, U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia, U.S. Attorney's Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Justin Maines, The Nye Law Group, PC, Savannah, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before William Pryor, Chief Judge, Wilson, Jordan, Rosenbaum, Jill Pryor, Newsom, Branch, Grant, Luck, Lagoa, and Brasher, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT: A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal will be reheard en banc. The panel's opinion is VACATED.


Summaries of

United States v. Pate

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 11, 2023
56 F.4th 1336 (11th Cir. 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Pate

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Jermaine PATE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

56 F.4th 1336 (11th Cir. 2023)

Citing Cases

United States v. Pate

See United States v. Pate, 43 F.4th 1268, 1269 (11th Cir. 2022). A majority of the active judges of this…

United States v. Depape

Mr. Depape cites as support the Ninth Circuit's interpretation of “on account of” in Reyes-Guerrero v.…