From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Parnell

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 17, 1959
272 F.2d 943 (6th Cir. 1959)

Opinion

Nos. 13831, 13832.

December 17, 1959.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville; William E. Miller, Judge.

Charles K. Rice, Leo M. McCormack, Lee A. Jackson and John J. Pajak, Washington, D.C., Fred Elledge, Jr., U.S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for appellant.

William Waller, Sr., Waller, Davis Lansden, Nashville, Tenn., for appellees.

Before MARTIN and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and BROOKS, District Judge.


The appeal of the United States from the judgment of these consolidated tax cases has been duly heard and considered upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys and upon the record in the cause, including the opinion of the District Court:

And it appearing that the findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and that the conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous but correctly drawn by Judge William E. Miller;

The judgment of the United States District Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Parnell

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 17, 1959
272 F.2d 943 (6th Cir. 1959)
Case details for

United States v. Parnell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Riley L. PARNELL et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 1959

Citations

272 F.2d 943 (6th Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Hanover Bank v. Commissioner

The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the Tax Court's orders sustaining the Commissioner's…