Opinion
3:17-cr-0051-HZ-11
11-04-2020
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM RANDEL OSBORN, Defendant.
Amy Potter United States Attorney's Office 405 E. 8th Avenue, Suite 2400 Eugene, OR 97401 Attorney for Plaintiff Brian C. Butler Office of the Public Defender 15 Newtown Street Medford, OR 97501 Attorney for Defendant
OPINION & ORDER Amy Potter
United States Attorney's Office
405 E. 8th Avenue, Suite 2400
Eugene, OR 97401
Attorney for Plaintiff Brian C. Butler
Office of the Public Defender
15 Newtown Street
Medford, OR 97501
Attorney for Defendant HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Defendant moves the Court to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). The Government opposes Defendant's motion. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
On July 10, 2019, Defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, cocaine and heroin. Pet. & Order Entering Guilty Plea, ECF 578. The Court sentenced Defendant to a 57-month term of imprisonment and a five-year term of supervised release. J. & Commitment, ECF 691. At the time of filing, Defendant's projected release date was January 1, 2024. Def. Mot. 4, ECF 708; Gov't Resp. 2, ECF 716. Defendant is currently serving his sentence at FCI Lompoc.
STANDARDS
A federal district court generally "may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c); Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 824-25 (2010). With the passage of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5191 (2018), however, Congress authorized the district court to modify a defendant's sentence on a motion for compassionate release:
[T]he court, upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or upon motion of the defendant after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant's facility, whichever is earlier may reduce the term of imprisonment . . . after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if it finds that—
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).(i) Extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction; [. . . ]
and that such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.
The policy statement issued by the United States Sentencing Commission identifies four categories of extraordinary and compelling reasons: (A) the medical condition of the defendant; (B) the age of the defendant; (C) family circumstances; and (D) other reasons, as determined by the Director of the BOP, that amount to an extraordinary and compelling reason "other than, or in combination with, the reasons described in subdivisions (A) through (C)." U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 app. n. 1(A)-(D).
The policy statement also requires the court to determine whether the circumstances warrant a reduction (and, if so, the amount of reduction), after considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and whether the defendant is a danger to the safety of any other person or to the community. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(4).
The defendant seeking a reduction of his sentence bears the burden to establish that the defendant has exhausted his administrative remedies and that extraordinary and compelling reasons exist to warrant a reduction of his or her sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A); United States v. Greenhut, 2:18-CR-00048-CAS-1, 2020 WL 509385, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2020) (holding that a defendant bears the burden of establishing entitlement to sentencing reduction and citing United States v. Sprague, 135 F.3d 1301, 1306-07 (9th Cir. 1998)).
DISCUSSION
Defendant is 48 years old. He suffers primarily from obesity, asthma, and hypertension. Def. Ex. 5, ECF 708. He tested positive for COVID-19 on May 5, 2020. Def. Mot. 2; Gov't Reply 2, 4. Defendant was asymptomatic and recovered without needing medical care. Id. He argues that his medical conditions, combined with the pandemic and particular vulnerability of prisoners, provide extraordinary and compelling reasons to reduce his sentence. Defendant further argues that the BOP will not be able to prevent him from becoming reinfected with COVID-19. The government argues Defendant has failed to demonstrate extraordinary and compelling circumstances, and that a reduction in sentence is inappropriate because Defendant is a danger to the community.
Defendant appears to have met the exhaustion requirement of the statute as 30 days have passed since he submitted his request for compassionate release to the Warden in June 2020. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). The Government does not address this issue.
As a preliminary matter, the Court acknowledges that we are in the midst of a global health crisis. The Court also acknowledges that prisoners are exceptionally vulnerable to infection due to the lack of distancing and hygiene issues endemic to prison life. Nevertheless, the Court cannot find that Defendant has met his burden to show that extraordinary and compelling reasons exist to warrant a reduction of his sentence.
Guidance for Correctional & Detention Facilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/correction-detention/guidance-correctional-detention.html (last updated July 22, 2020).
According to the CDC, older adults and people with certain underlying medical conditions are more likely to become severely ill from COVID-19. These conditions include "serious heart conditions, such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathies," cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type-2 diabetes, and obesity. The CDC has also identified conditions that might increase the risk for severe illness from COVID-19. These conditions include asthma (moderate-to-severe), hypertension or high blood pressure, and type-1 diabetes.
People at Increased Risk of Severe Illness, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-at-increased-risk.html (last updated Sept. 11, 2020).
People with Certain Medical Conditions, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fneed-extra-precautions%2Fgroups-at-higher-risk.html (last updated Oct. 6, 2020).
Id.
Id. Conditions listed as likely to increase the risk of severe illness from COVID-19 are supported by the "strongest and most consistent evidence," defined as "consistent evidence from multiple small studies or a strong association from a large study." Scientific Evidence for Conditions that Increase Risk of Severe Illness, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/evidence-table.html (last updated Oct. 6, 2020). Conditions that may increase the risk for severe illness from COVID-19 are supported by mixed evidence, defined as "multiple studies that reached different conclusions about risk associated with a condition," or limited evidence, defined as "consistent evidence from a small number of studies." Id.
Defendant is understandably concerned about his exposure to COVID-19, a virus that he has already contracted and that thrives in crowded, confined spaces. However, "[t]he fact of the matter is that many prisoners—and many members of the general public—have some condition that elevates their COVID-19 risk as compared to a healthy young person." United States v. Jackson, No. 3:09-CR-00170-1-MO, 2020 WL 3889701, at *2 (D. Or. July 9, 2020). Here, Defendant, at 48, is younger than the high-risk group identified by the CDC, and the evidence is mixed as to asthma and hypertension.
The Court accepts that Defendant's prior COVID-19 infection has not conferred him with any sort of meaningful immunity from reinfection. Nevertheless, it appears that the BOP has taken significant steps to prevent the recurrence of large outbreaks that several facilities, including FCI Lompoc, experienced at the beginning of the pandemic. Indeed, the situation now appears to be generally well controlled; as of October 11, 2020, with a population of 962 inmates, FCI Lompoc is reporting that no inmates and only three staff members are currently infected. These circumstances are not so compelling or extraordinary as to justify Defendant's release. See Jackson, 2020 WL 3889701, at *2 (finding threshold for compassionate release was not met where 48-year-old man with asthma was in a facility with no confirmed COVID-19 cases among inmates and isolated staff infections that appeared under control). Because Defendant has failed to show extraordinary and compelling reasons for his release, the Court need not reach the § 3553(a) factors and finds that a reduction in sentence is not appropriate.
Population Statistics, Federal Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/populationstatistics.jsp (last updated Oct. 8, 2020); COVID-19 Coronavirus, Federal Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/coronavirus/ (last visited Oct. 11, 2020). --------
CONCLUSION
The Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) [708] without prejudice and with leave to seek reconsideration if circumstances change.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: No v embe r 4, 2020.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge