From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. De Leon-Navarro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 13, 2012
10-CR-188A (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2012)

Opinion

10-CR-188A

08-13-2012

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ERIC DE LEON-NAVARRO, SR., Defendant.


ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On June 15, 2012, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion for suppression of statements and evidence be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion for suppression of statements and evidence is denied.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

______________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. De Leon-Navarro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 13, 2012
10-CR-188A (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. De Leon-Navarro

Case Details

Full title:THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ERIC DE LEON-NAVARRO, SR., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 13, 2012

Citations

10-CR-188A (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Glover

courts have expressly rejected the suggestion that a named target in a wiretap application has standing, see…