Summary
holding that "the facts alleged must warrant an inference that the statement is material"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ChaseOpinion
No. CR-78-38.
February 20, 1979
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
United States v. Olin Corp.
United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 20, 1979
465 F. Supp. 1120 (W.D.N.Y. 1979)
Summaries of
United States v. Olin Corp.
United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 20, 1979
465 F. Supp. 1120 (W.D.N.Y. 1979)
holding that "the facts alleged must warrant an inference that the statement is material"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Chasestating that "[i]t is not necessary that an indictment show conclusively that the statements are material"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ChaseIn United States v. Olin Corp., 465 F.Supp. 1120 (W.D.N.Y. 1979), the court held that unsupported suspicions of grand jury abuse by the prosecution did not justify disturbing the secrecy of the grand jury's proceedings.
Summary of this case from U.S. v. UllahCase details for
United States v. Olin Corp.
Case Details
Full title:The UNITED STATES of America v. OLIN CORPORATION, Wilburt Kleiber, Calvin…
Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York
Date published: Feb 20, 1979
Citations
465 F. Supp. 1120 (W.D.N.Y. 1979)
Citing Cases
United States v. Boffa
Grand Jury proceedings generally are accorded a presumption of regularity, United States v. Winchester, 407…
In re Grand Jury 89-2532 F. Supp. at 1136. The court in United States v. Olin Corp., 465 F. Supp. 1120 (W.D.N.Y. 1979), also…