From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Niroku Komai

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California, Southern Division
Feb 8, 1923
286 F. 450 (S.D. Cal. 1923)

Opinion


286 F. 450 (S.D.Cal. 1923) UNITED STATES v. NIROKU KOMAI et al. No. 4514. United States District Court, S.D. California, Southern Division. February 8, 1923

Joseph C. Burke, U.S. Atty., and Mark L. Herron, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal.

Cooper, Collings & Shreve, of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

Page 451.

TRIPPET, District Judge.

The defendant, Komai, has been convicted of a conspiracy to conceal and harbor a Japanese alien not duly admitted to the United States by an immigration inspector of the United States, and not entitled to reside within the United States. The defendant has made a motion in arrest of judgment. Section 8 of the Immigration Law is as follows:

'Sec. 8. That any person, including the master, agent, owner, or consignee of any vessel, who shall bring into or land in the United States, by vessel or otherwise, or shall attempt, by himself or through another, to bring into or land in the United States, by vessel or otherwise, or shall conceal or harbor, or attempt to conceal or harbor, or assist or abet another to conceal or harbor in any place, including any building, vessel, railway car, conveyance, or vehicle, any alien not duly admitted by an immigrant inspector or not lawfully entitled to enter or to reside within the United States, under the terms of this act, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $2,000 and by imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, for each and every alien so landed or brought in or attempted to be landed or brought in. ' Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, Sec. 4289 1/4dd.

Section 37 of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. Sec. 10201) provides that, if two or more persons conspire to commit any offense against the United States, they shall be guilty of a conspiracy. Defense counsel raises the question that, since there is no penalty provided for harboring an alien in the United States, there can be no conspiracy under section 37.

It is plain that section 8 provides no penalty for the misdemeanor defined therein of concealing or harboring an alien. The penalty only relates to bringing in or landing in the United States the alien. There is not even any ambiguity in the statute on this subject. In my opinion the fact that no penalty of any kind is prescribed by section 8 does not bar a prosecution for a conspiracy. Section 8 describes concealing and harboring an alien as an offense, to wit, a misdemeanor. One who conspires to commit a misdemeanor 'hath offended the law.'

The motion in arrest of judgment will be overruled. Biskind v. United States (C.C.A.) 281 F. 47; U.S. v. Stevenson, 215 U.S. 190, 30 Sup.Ct. 35, 54 L.Ed. 153; U.S. v. Hutto, 256 U.S. 524, 41 Sup.Ct. 541, 65 L.Ed. 1073.


Summaries of

United States v. Niroku Komai

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California, Southern Division
Feb 8, 1923
286 F. 450 (S.D. Cal. 1923)
Case details for

United States v. Niroku Komai

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. NIROKU KOMAI et al.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 8, 1923

Citations

286 F. 450 (S.D. Cal. 1923)

Citing Cases

United States v. Evans

The Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit construes the section to prescribe a penalty for…