From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nguyen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 6, 2014
13-CR-6044L (W.D.N.Y. May. 6, 2014)

Opinion

13-CR-6044L

05-06-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAWN NGUYEN, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

This Court referred all pretrial matters in the case to United States Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Magistrate Judge Payson issued a thorough, 48 page Decision and Order and Report and Recommendation dealing with the several motions filed by defendant. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Payson recommended that this Court deny defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment, deny the motion to suppress evidence seized and deny the motion to suppress statements.

By a letter dated May 2, 2014, counsel for defendant advised that no objections to the Report and Recommendation would be filed.

I have reviewed the thorough Report and Recommendation and the filings previously made in the case, and I see no reason to reject or modify the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payson. Therefore, I accept and adopt the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #56), and I deny defendant's motions (Dkt. #35, #36) to dismiss the indictment, to suppress evidence and to suppress statements.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

DAVID G. LARIMER

United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York

May 6, 2014.


Summaries of

United States v. Nguyen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 6, 2014
13-CR-6044L (W.D.N.Y. May. 6, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Nguyen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAWN NGUYEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 6, 2014

Citations

13-CR-6044L (W.D.N.Y. May. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Scully

At least one court has taken this approach with respect to a particularity challenge.See United States v.…