From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nazarian

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Dec 30, 2016
No. 16-2889 (8th Cir. Dec. 30, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-2889

12-30-2016

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Aaron Nazarian Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield [Unpublished] Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

While Aaron Nazarian was serving a third term of federal supervised release, the District Court revoked supervised release and sentenced Nazarian to serve 12 months and one day in prison with no further supervised release. Nazarian appeals, and we affirm.

The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. --------

For reversal, Nazarian challenges the District Court's finding that he violated his release conditions and the decision to revoke supervised release. This argument fails, given Nazarian's admissions at the revocation hearing that he violated multiple supervised-release conditions. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (providing that a court may revoke a term of supervised release if it "finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a condition of supervised release"); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). Nazarian also argues that the District Court committed procedural error in sentencing him and imposed a substantively unreasonable revocation sentence. This argument fails as well. Upon careful review of the record, we detect no procedural error. See Miller, 557 F.3d at 916 (listing sources of procedural error). Further, the revocation sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Merrival, 521 F.3d 889, 890 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review). Notably, the sentence exceeded the top of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range by one day in order to provide Nazarian with the benefit of prior-custody credit. Moreover, the court expressly considered and weighed relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing the sentence. See Miller, 557 F.3d at 917.

We affirm the judgment and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.


Summaries of

United States v. Nazarian

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Dec 30, 2016
No. 16-2889 (8th Cir. Dec. 30, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Nazarian

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Aaron Nazarian Defendant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 30, 2016

Citations

No. 16-2889 (8th Cir. Dec. 30, 2016)