From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Murdock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Mar 3, 2014
Case No. 2:11 CR 105-1 (D. Vt. Mar. 3, 2014)

Summary

concluding under Rule 1.7 of Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct that a spousal relationship between a defense lawyer and prosecutor would be waivable

Summary of this case from Vone Wynn v. Lee

Opinion

Case No. 2:11 CR 105-1

03-03-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SETH MURDOCK


ORDER

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed January 28, 2014. Defendant's objection was filed February 11, 2014.

A district judge must make a de novo determination of those portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to which an objection is made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); Perez-Rubio v. Wyckoff, 718 F.Supp. 217, 227 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). The district judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Id.

After careful review of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the objections, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full.

The motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence (Doc. 92)is DENIED and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 93) is also DENIED.

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(b), a certificate of appealability is DENIED because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of denial of a federal right. Furthermore, the petitioner's grounds for relief do not present issues which are debatable among jurists of reasons, which could have been resolved differently, or which deserve further proceedings. See e.g., Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3rd 878, 882-83 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 513 U.S. 946 (1994); Sawyer v. Collins, 986 F.2d 1493, 1497 (5th cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 933 (1993).

Furthermore, it is certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

THIS CASE IS CLOSED.

Dated at Burlington, in the District of Vermont, this 3rd day of March, 2014.

__________

William K. Sessions III

U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Murdock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Mar 3, 2014
Case No. 2:11 CR 105-1 (D. Vt. Mar. 3, 2014)

concluding under Rule 1.7 of Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct that a spousal relationship between a defense lawyer and prosecutor would be waivable

Summary of this case from Vone Wynn v. Lee
Case details for

United States v. Murdock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SETH MURDOCK

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Date published: Mar 3, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:11 CR 105-1 (D. Vt. Mar. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Vone Wynn v. Lee

Indeed, analogous caselaw indicates that such a conflict is waivable if made knowingly and voluntarily. See…