From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morton

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
May 18, 2021
996 F.3d 754 (5th Cir. 2021)

Opinion

No. 19-10842

05-18-2021

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Brian Matthew MORTON, Defendant—Appellant.

Amber Michelle Grand, Attorney, Leigha Amy Simonton, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Brandon Elliott Beck, Federal Public Defender's Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.


Amber Michelle Grand, Attorney, Leigha Amy Simonton, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Brandon Elliott Beck, Federal Public Defender's Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Owen, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Per Curiam: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated January 5, 2021, is VACATED.


Summaries of

United States v. Morton

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
May 18, 2021
996 F.3d 754 (5th Cir. 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Morton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. BRIAN MATTHEW MORTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 18, 2021

Citations

996 F.3d 754 (5th Cir. 2021)

Citing Cases

Teal v. State

At the conclusion of the hearing, Teal's counsel argued that the warrant had not been sufficiently…

United States v. Schulte

Cf. Moore, 968 F.2d at 222 (holding that the application was not lacking in indicia of probable cause where…