From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moorer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Mar 8, 2019
Case No. 1:14-cr-214 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cr-214

03-08-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JERMAINE MOORER, Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 1054] :

In this case, Jermaine Moorer again petitions the Court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because Moorer did not obtain the required circuit approval to file a second habeas petition, the Court TRANSFERS the case to the Sixth Circuit.

Doc. 1054. Defendant supplements. Doc. 1056. The Government opposes. Doc. 1059.

In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997) (holding that, when a petitioner files a habeas petition in the district court without circuit approval, the district court should transfer the petition to the Sixth Circuit).

In November 2014, Defendant Moorer pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. The Court sentenced Moorer to 102 months in prison—served concurrently with a related state sentence—and five years of supervised release. It also ordered that Moorer be given credit for time served.

Doc. 353 at 2.

Doc. 550 at 2-3.

Id.

In July 2016, Moorer petitioned the Court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argued that: (i) his prosecution violated the double jeopardy clause, (ii) his plea agreement was not knowing and voluntary, (iii) the Court erred in considering the sentencing factors, and (iv) the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") did not give him credit for time served. The Court denied that petition in November 2016.

Doc. 905.

Id.

Doc. 931.

Moorer returns, again seeking relief from his sentence. He resurrects his previous argument that the BOP still has not given him credit for time served. He also now claims that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective during sentencing.

Doc. 1054.

However, because this is Moorer's second habeas petition, he needs Sixth Circuit approval to proceed—which he does not have.

Accordingly, the Court TRANSFERS the case to the Sixth Circuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 8, 2019

s/ James S . Gwin

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Moorer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Mar 8, 2019
Case No. 1:14-cr-214 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Moorer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JERMAINE MOORER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Mar 8, 2019

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cr-214 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2019)