From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mook

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Feb 6, 1942
125 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1942)

Opinion

February 6, 1942.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Albert Mook and George Fleming were convicted of violating the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and they appeal. On motion to dismiss the two appeals.

Appeals dismissed.

David Haar, of New York City, for appellants.

Joseph Brandwen, Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.


Mook was convicted of violating the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and appealed. Thereafter he died; and his administratrix now seeks to revive the appeal. The authorities give us no alternative but to dismiss the appeal. Nevertheless, we think it may not be amiss to say that it seems to us that the next-of-kin of a convicted person who dies pending an appeal have an interest in clearing his good name, which Congress might well believe would justify a change in the law.

United States v. Pomeroy, C.C., 152 F. 279; United States v. Dunne, 9 Cir., 173 F. 254, 19 Ann.Cas. 1145; Dyar v. United States, 5 Cir., 186 F. 614, 623; United States v. Theurer, 5 Cir., 213 F. 964, 967; Pino v. United States, 7 Cir., 278 F. 479; Rossi v. United States, 8 Cir., 21 F.2d 747.

The appellant, Fleming, was convicted at the same time, but in his case sentence was suspended and he was put on probation for one day. His appeal also must be dismissed. In United States v. La Shagway, 9 Cir., 95 F.2d 200, the appellant had been sentenced, but execution was suspended; therefore an appeal lay under Berman v. U.S., 302 U.S. 211, 58 S.Ct. 164, 82 L.Ed. 204. If Fleming wishes to review the judgment at bar, it is always possible for him to apply for sentence and suspension of execution.

United States v. Lecato, 2 Cir., 29 F.2d 694; United States v. Levinson, 2 Cir., 54 F.2d 363; United States v. Knickerbocker Fur Coat Co., 2 Cir., 66 F.2d 388; Birnbaum v. United States, 4 Cir., 107 F.2d 885, 126 A.L.R. 1207; United States v. Albers, 2 Cir., 115 F.2d 833.

Appeals dismissed.


Summaries of

United States v. Mook

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Feb 6, 1942
125 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1942)
Case details for

United States v. Mook

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. MOOK et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Feb 6, 1942

Citations

125 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1942)

Citing Cases

Zalkind v. Scheinman

We have heretofore deemed it appropriate in an opinion to suggest statutory changes. See United States v.…

United States v. Knetzer

This is based upon sound reason, since the administrator has no right to pursue the appeal in a criminal…