From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Monroe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 2, 2012
CR. NO. 1:09-CR-53-WKW (M.D. Ala. Feb. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CR. NO. 1:09-CR-53-WKW

02-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v CURTIS M. MONROE, JR.


(WO)


ORDER

Upon consideration of the pro se motions for transcripts and discovery (doc. ## 75 and 76) filed pro se by the defendant, it is

ORDERED that the motions be and are hereby DENIED. In 2011 Monroe plead guilty to possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) and was sentence to a term of imprisonment of 97 months. He did not appeal. The records of this court further show that Monroe has not filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. "Fees for transcripts furnished in proceedings brought under section 2255 ... to persons permitted to sue ... in forma pauperis shall be paid by the United States ... if the trial judge ... certifies that the suit ... is not frivolous and that the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented by the suit...." 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). The Eleventh Circuit's predecessor court has previously affirmed a district court's denial of a federal prisoner's transcript request where the appellant had no appeal pending and had not moved to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Walker v. United States, 424 F.2d 278, 279 (5th Cir.1970) (holding that "only where a [habeas] petitioner ... has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner is entitled to be furnished copies of court records without costs."). Moreover, "[b]ased on the plain language and necessary operation of [ 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) ], ... a motion for a free transcript pursuant to § 753(f) is not ripe until a § 2255 motion has been filed." United States v. Horvath, 157 F.3d 131, 132 (2d Cir.1998); see also United States v. Losing, 601 F.2d 351, 352 (8th Cir.1979) (holding that, under the language of § 753(f) and the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317 (1976), "any request for a free transcript prior to the filing of a section 2255 complaint is premature."). For the same reasons, Monroe's discovery requests are premature.

_____________

CHARLES S. COODY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Monroe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 2, 2012
CR. NO. 1:09-CR-53-WKW (M.D. Ala. Feb. 2, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Monroe

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v CURTIS M. MONROE, JR.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 2, 2012

Citations

CR. NO. 1:09-CR-53-WKW (M.D. Ala. Feb. 2, 2012)